Comparing definitive unilateral cleft rhinoplasty with and without diced-cartilage alar-base augmentation: A retrospective cohort study.

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the long-term aesthetic outcomes and satisfaction of patients who underwent two techniques of definitive unilateral cleft rhinoplasty. The two cohorts, comprising patients with mature unilateral cleft deformity, were managed with definitive rhinoplasty, either with or without diced-cartilage alar-base and peri-alar augmentation (ABPA). Thirty patients were included in each cohort. Anthropometric measurements, complications, patient satisfaction scores, and third-party surgeon assessment scores were reviewed. In both cohorts, anthropometric parameters improved. Rhinoplasty with ABPA was the superior cohort in terms of columellar length (10.3 ± 1.0 in the cohort with ABPA, compared with 7.9 ± 0.6 in the cohort without ABPA; p < 0.001), alar-base angle (0.2 ± 0.2, compared with 4.3 ± 0.3; p < 0.001), and columellar deviation (2.5 ± 1.4, compared with 10.3 ± 2.1; p < 0.001). This cohort also had more symmetry in nostril height and nostril width (p < 0.001), a lower recurrence rate (one case compared with 22 cases; p < 0.001), a higher patient satisfaction score (p = 0.002), and a higher surgeon assessment score (p < 0.001, Cronbach's alpha = 0.706, Kendall's coefficient of concordance = 0.787). Within the limitations of this study, it appears that the described technique for augmenting the alar-base and peri-alar maxillary area is manageable, and yields consistent long-term results.

The efficacy of excision followed by intralesional 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone acetonide versus excision followed by radiotherapy in the treatment of ear keloids: A randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: The ear is the common site for keloid formation especially in women after ear piercing. Surgery is the main stay of treatment in these lesions but there are large numbers of treatment failures in surgery alone. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of post-excision intralesional 5-fluorouracil/triamcinolone acetonide (5-FU/TAC) and post-excision radiotherapy in the treatment of ear keloids. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The study was conducted from May 2014 to January 2015 at Jinnah Burn and Reconstructive Surgery Centre, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore. SUBJECT & METHODOLOGY: After approval from the hospital ethical committee, 60 patients presented in the outpatient department fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected and randomly assigned in two groups with the help of the random number table. Patients in group A had excision followed by intralesional 5-FU/TAC injections while patients of group B had excision followed by radiotherapy. Patients were assessed at 6 months after completion of treatment for efficacy (no recurrence within 6 months of treatment). RESULTS: In our study total of 60 patients completed the study, with 30 patients in each group. 7 patients (23.34%) in Group-A and 9 patients (30%) in Group-B were males while 23 patients (76.67%) in Group-A and 21 patients (70%) in Group-B were females i.e. male to female ratio is 1:2.75. Mean age was 31.8+6.48years. The comparison of frequency of efficacy in both groups showed that 73.33% (n=22) in Group-A and 43.33% (n=13) in Group-B had efficacy, p value was calculated as 0.01, showing a significant statistical difference. CONCLUSION: Excision and intralesional 5-FU/TAC is an effective treatment for keloids on the ears.